Livininsanity

Righting Irreverence ©

Archive for the ‘Communities’ Category

Patriarchy and Subservience in the World Today

Posted by livininsanity on May 10, 2011

One could argue that women in certain cultures, societies and/or communities could use saving. It is no secret that in Islamic circles, women are considered subservient to men. It is also now no secret that the Brooklyn, NY, Hasidic newspaper Der Tzitung recently cropped a Whitehouse war room photo showing Hillary Clinton covering her mouth with her hand, as she watched the proceedings leading up to the assassinatino of Osama Bin Ladin, last week. The small newspaper, apparently, never prints photos of women because they may be sexually suggestive. This recent newspaper event proves something I already knew – patriarchal societies still exist all over the world. So, one could feasibly argue that many women who are stuck in subservient situations need salvation.

I’ve experienced a subservient culture first-hand. In a way, I would argue we all have, in that we’ve all felt the long-term effects of what it has ingrained in society, in women and in men. But, my experience was more immediate and direct. While visiting such a culture, I volunteered to work under a woman. At the time, I thought nothing of it. However, in retrospect, some probably viewed it as offensive. Undoubtedly, I challenged the status quo and made people think. It was not long before I was re-assigned to work with a fellow man.

A friend of mine recently derided women seeking “sugar daddies.” I’ve always been put-off by the concept also. However, within the historical concept of patriarchy, where women are subservient to men, the concept of a ‘sugar daddy’ seems almost like a natural progression. So, in a historical context, one could argue it makes sense, unfortunately. This got me to thinking about the post on “Debunking Cosmo.”

Cosmopolitan and similar women’s magazines are, in a way, extending the patriarchal notion, by telling women they need to dress, act and behave in a certain way for men, in order to be accepted. It’s now becoming easier for me to see why women buy into such notions – it is ingrained in them, historically, through the concept of patriarchy – a concept which still exists in cultures and communities throughout the World, including the United States of America.

As previously mentioned, I’ve spent time in a community where women were considered to be directly subservient to women. They were, in no way, considered equal. This extended from elder, married women to young women, to little girls. I felt bad for the young women who grew up in such a society and were stuck there. I felt an urge to “save them.” However, simultaneously, I knew I had no better place to take them to. I knew of no society, culture or community that would be ideal. I still don’t. That is sad.

Patriarchy is more veiled in the United States, but it is present. It is ingrained in media, people and their actions. So, I’m forced to ask myself, is it better to be patriarchal and be up-front about it, or, like much of “modern” society, is it better to have subliminal patriarchy? I think neither is desirable. The latter even seems more conniving, in a way. So, yes, women in proclaimed patriarchal societies need saving, but we all do.

Posted in Communities, Hillary Clinton, Religion | Tagged: , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

What Consensus and Egalitarianism Teach us about the NFL’s Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA)

Posted by livininsanity on February 16, 2011

How my Diverse Experiences Living in Alternative Communities Informs about the NFL Community’s CBA

I have lived in communities based on consensus and egalitarianism. I know that makes me a freak of nature, but it also provides me with additional insight about the NFL’s Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA). Both consensus and egalitarian communities and the NFL’s CBA process require lots of diverse people to come together and agree. Or, at the very least, they must agree to come to collective terms through some form of bargaining.

Finalizing agreements on large issues in consensus and/or egalitarian communities is very difficult. I’ve personally seen it take years for people to agree how to use a small space, measuring twenty-five square feet. Simultaneously, I’ve witnessed bigger projects, involving large sums of money and investment, get vetoed at the last minute, in spite of over half a decade of planning. For these reasons, Continue >

Posted in Alternative, Communities, Football, NFL CBA | Tagged: , , , | Leave a Comment »

Five Questions

Posted by livininsanity on January 25, 2009

Do I believe in the autonomical* marriage unit?  I believe it exists extraordinarily rampantly, unfathomably to my own thought processes.  But, no, I do not believe it is the best way to live.

*The word “autonomy” is confusing in the context of marriage, since marriage is “a self governing community” and it’s members do not have “independence or freedom, as of the will or one’s actions: the autonomy of the individual.”  I suppose the collective marriage theoretically has an independence or freedom.

Do I plan on creating children?  No.  (Note the intentional wording of the question.)  To be perfectly honest, I think it would be irresponsible for me to introduce new life to this place.

Let me elaborate.  If I can not find a peaceful unison between the vast majority of society and the idealist tennants of ecovillage life, while maintaining my own ideals, then I don’t think it’s fair for me to bring another into the messy equation.  It’s kind of like saying, “I can’t finish this huge T-bone steak, I’m stuffed, give me a another side of mashed potatoes and green beans… maybe then I’ll be able to finish the T-bone.”

Do I plan on returning to an ecovillage?  I fully intend to return to an ecovillage-ish way of life.

Why?  I often view this question as filled with an abundance of ignorance.  I feel it is like asking, “Will you ever attempt to eat food again?”  Seriously.  To elaborate, let me break the question down into many lesser questions that the one question encompasses:

“Does the use of solar energy make sense?”

“How about the use of a solar powered golf cart as a main means of transportation?”

“How about the fact that a solar powered golf cart can sufficiently be your main means of transportation?”

“Does community make sense?”

 To elaborate further (and apparently change my font)…

My community is currently dealing with the issue of “people not mowing/cutting their lawns in a timely manner.”  This utterly baffles me.  It presupposes that people A) have grass, B) do not have a use for it and C) continue to grow it – at their own expense.  This would NEVER be an issue at an ecovillage.  At ecovillages, people do not grow grass because of some vain and silly tradition or mark or class, or whatever idiocy propagated this and many other actions currently present in the vast majority of the American psyche.  Grass that is present at ecovillages is eaten by cows, sheep, goats (although they’ll tear out the roots if you’re not careful) and whatever other animals the grass was grown for.  It is used.  That’s why it is there.   Traditionally at an ecovillage (what a mix of words), there is no grass present for aesthetic reasons.  Although, ironically, grass has been used for aestheticism to appeal to “visitors.”  (Luckily, all grass is used to feed animals.)  However, the irony is thick.

Am I ridiculously and constantly baffled by the World?  Yes.

Posted in Alternative, Communities, Ecovillages, Energy, Five Questions, Independence, Zoning | Tagged: , , | Leave a Comment »

Communities in the News… Sort of

Posted by livininsanity on June 23, 2008

The Crown Dependency of Forvik recently declared its’ independence on June 21st, 2008. Applications are now being accepted for Forvik Citizenship. So, if you want to move to a tiny island spanning 2.5 acres, known as Papa Stour, among the Shetland Islands, then now is your chance.

Unfortunately, access to the island is, currently, somewhat formidable. Furthermore, there are not currently any buildings on the island, which contains no tress, however if these things excite you, then you are certainly welcomed to Forvik Island by owner Stuart Hill. The man is a 65 year old who is fed up with liars, tyranny and other government antics. As such, Stuart Hill has created his own website, flag, plans for currency and other activities necessary for the development of Forvik as an independent entity.

Posted in Communities, Independence | Tagged: , , | 1 Comment »

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.